Visitors - Bless my Tail! Welcome to Fiver's Honeycomb!


This place is dedicated to Watership Down and its fans worldwide.

Here you can discuss all WD-related media, including both books, the movie and both TV series.

What? You are not registered yet?

Author Topic: Return to Neverland (Peter Pan 2, Disney 2002)  (Read 441 times)

Offline Darkling Nocturnal

  • Council of Chiefs
  • Fiver
  • *******
  • Posts: 4154
    • Show only replies by Darkling Nocturnal
    • View Profile
  • Favorite WD media: N/A
  • I speak:
Return to Neverland (Peter Pan 2, Disney 2002)
« on: June 20, 2016, 07:25:28 PM »
Alright, I just start now a topic for the sequel, because I'm curious about your opinions.

First of all: The first movie is simply great, but the sequel... I don't know what to think.

I have no problem with the portrayal of Hook. I have no problem with the war theme. I have no problem with the short running time. I have no problem with the manner of the lost boys. And I have no problem with a flying priate ship in London. I also think, that some things are very well done. The "I don't believe in fairies"-theme

But I have a problem with two big continuation errors:

First: What happened with the crocodile and why is a giant calamari haunting Hook (alright, it tasted Hook, but yet)?

Second: How did the pirates get their ship back? Peter Pan was flying it at the end of the first movie and in the beginning of the sequel.

Those two errors are really bothering me. Have I overlookied something? Can someone explain me this?


Kneel down before the greatness of Darkling's dark ... ... ... Darkness!!!
(note to myself: I need a new scriptwriter) (Avatar by Silverweed's Claws)

Offline MeadowRabbit

  • Raw carrot? Yes, please!
  • Blackberry
  • ******
  • Posts: 1117
    • Show only replies by MeadowRabbit
    • View Profile
  • Favorite WD media: The movie
  • I speak:
Return to Neverland (Peter Pan 2, Disney 2002)
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2016, 07:54:48 PM »
I haven't seen this sequel, so will also add to the questions: is it actually worth a watch at all? :p
Here lies a signature that has little point.

Offline Hazel

  • A wave in the ocean
  • Junior Owsla
  • Dandelion
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
    • Show only replies by Hazel
    • View Profile
  • Favorite WD media: The book
  • FHC contest winner:
  • I speak:
Return to Neverland (Peter Pan 2, Disney 2002)
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2016, 10:12:04 AM »
I've seen the sequel and I think it was pleasant enough to be worth the watch, Meadow. :D

Such is the nature of bizarre Disney sequels I suppose :lol I guess the only excuse would be it's a different ship? Or they just wanted to let Hook have it for the sequel

With the octopus, it's what you said I guess. He wanted to feed Jane to it and instead the octopus decided he liked how Hook tasted and pursued him. I guess it's a new replacement for the crocodile, for some reason. I would have preferred the crocodile.

I need to watch it again and see if I can find any answers myself :p
"People’s souls are like gardens. You can’t turn your back on someone because his garden’s full of weeds. You have to give him water and lots of sunshine."