Thank you all! It's appreciated.
I've been having trouble finding something else. Well, I wrote this reader-response essay last school year for a class assignment. It's not my best work, but I'll just post it
GhostsIt feels comforting to have a name for things. Giving objects a label allows them to be easier to talk about and, somehow, makes them seem more familiar. Thus, after its discovery, the downward force on matter was named gravity and the way it behaves was christened the “law of gravity”. They were always there, just nameless for a while.
Stating that the laws of nature live solely in the mind may be a stretch. This is essentially saying that the laws of nature don’t even exist. And the truth is that the laws we created might not be true; we actually don’t know. However, some type of law must be driving nature. The universe and the way it functions have been here before humans have realized it. Otherwise, how could the world ever spun? Even if our manmade laws of nature aren’t accurate, something is there to keep life going. So while I agree that the rules we created to explain how the world works may exist only in our minds (because they are not necessarily true), there are laws – there has to be - that are very, very real. And something that is real cannot be a ghost.
I would like to counter argue the narrator’s claim about the qualities that make something “real”. According to him, for something to exist it must have matter and energy of its own. Fair claim, but what, then, can be said about emotions? They have no matter at all, and they can only occur through the energy of the people who hold them. But to say they are not real is to contradict the many actions that occur day after day, ignited by our very feelings. Emotions provoke us to act. They are the cause; actions are the effect. Without them, many things would be left undone. I don’t see how something that is not real can carry so much influence.
Concerning the existence of the force and law of gravity, the points I made still apply. Firstly, the force of gravity is a given – it must have existed long before it was found. Are we to believe that until Newton discovered gravity, people were floating around in the air? And that, right after he uncovered its secrets, gravity suddenly appeared in a poof? The force of gravity was discovered by Newton, not created by him.
The law of gravity is a more complex topic but goes back to what I said. It is possible that the law we made to describe how this force works may be only in our minds (if it’s not true). But if it is indeed an accurate representation of our universe, then this law of gravity has existed long before Newton. Either way, some kind of laws has been around for a very long time. The force of gravity couldn’t exist without some way that it functions – hence, what we have termed the “law of gravity”. Gravity needs rules to follow. Whether one believes in a supernatural God keeping the force under control or determined and fixed laws of science, it must work in a certain way. Therefore, the force of gravity and its laws must co-exist. The question is whether the law of gravity (and other aspects of science) that we as humans have come up with is actually real or simply a ghost.